Tyre Comparison Chart.
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2004 10:49 pm
AberdeenBikers
Welcome to the AberdeenBikers Forum
https://www.aberdeenbikers.co.uk/phpBB3/
Tyre Comparison Chart.
https://www.aberdeenbikers.co.uk/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=2463
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2004 9:33 am
Confusing otherwise, isnt it?
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2004 10:13 am
Yes
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2004 10:24 am
Totally logical. Only problem now is that Bridgestone now say the 010 is a sports touring and the 020 is touring?..Now thats confusing!..I can't believe it's not butter!
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2004 10:42 am
Makes sense to me. I ripped the ares out of the 012 rear in 2K miles. The replacement 010 has done 2.5K and still has plenty wear left.Backs 400 wrote:Totally logical. Only problem now is that Bridgestone now say the 010 is a sports touring and the 020 is touring?..Now thats confusing!..I can't believe it's not butter!
The 012 front did about 3K o I just replaced it like for like.
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2004 10:53 am
Maybe you should go for there new super sticky tyres then 
You should wreck a rear in less than a 1000 miles 
Not sure how Contiforce Max (Billy-Ray) are up there..had them on the GSXF and they were the scariest tyres I have ever known..reminded me of the old Chien Sheng tyres we used on the scooters at £8 each :)
You should wreck a rear in less than a 1000 miles Not sure how Contiforce Max (Billy-Ray) are up there..had them on the GSXF and they were the scariest tyres I have ever known..reminded me of the old Chien Sheng tyres we used on the scooters at £8 each :)