Tyre Comparison Chart.
-
Dickie
- Tank Slapper
- Posts: 679
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 9:22 pm
- Current Ride: SV650, ER6 and a pikey van
- Location: Aberdeen
-
dale123
- Knee Flapper
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 1:00 am
- Location: Aberdeen
- Contact:
-
Zathos
- Mr Magpie
- Posts: 3161
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 10:46 pm
- Current Ride: Aprilia Tuono Factory R
- Location: Everywhere & Nowhere
Makes sense to me. I ripped the ares out of the 012 rear in 2K miles. The replacement 010 has done 2.5K and still has plenty wear left.Backs 400 wrote:Totally logical. Only problem now is that Bridgestone now say the 010 is a sports touring and the 020 is touring?..Now thats confusing!..I can't believe it's not butter!
The 012 front did about 3K o I just replaced it like for like.
-
Backs 400
- Late Braker
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 1:00 am
- Current Ride: Cbr 600 F4
- Location: Banchory(ish)
Maybe you should go for there new super sticky tyres then 
You should wreck a rear in less than a 1000 miles 
Not sure how Contiforce Max (Billy-Ray) are up there..had them on the GSXF and they were the scariest tyres I have ever known..reminded me of the old Chien Sheng tyres we used on the scooters at £8 each :)
You should wreck a rear in less than a 1000 miles Not sure how Contiforce Max (Billy-Ray) are up there..had them on the GSXF and they were the scariest tyres I have ever known..reminded me of the old Chien Sheng tyres we used on the scooters at £8 each :)